See also past Guest columns.

Naming the Gosnell babies — Connecting with the humanity of aborted babies Print
Guest column
Monday, May. 13, 2013 -- 12:00 AM

This is especially true when we see what the Gosnell case has confronted us with: bodies of babies in bags and cartons in the freezer, severed feet in jars, some 45 babies retrieved in a raid on the clinic and entrusted to the Philadelphia Medical Examiner.

Names given to the children murdered by abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell

Baby Adam

Baby Michael

Baby Alex

Baby Chris

Baby Andy

Baby Lou

Baby Pat

Baby Joshua

Baby David

Baby Ashley

Baby Sal

Baby Terry

Baby Sam

Baby Val

Baby Tony

Baby Ronnie

Baby Sarah

Baby Melanie

Baby Sandy

Baby Corey

Baby Drew

Baby Ryan

Baby Toby

Baby Sean

Baby Kelly

Baby Carroll

Baby Joseph

Baby Benjamin

Baby Stacey

Baby Gabriel

Baby Brett

Baby Julian

Baby Taylor

Baby Courtney

Baby Danny

Baby Kim

Baby Mandy

Baby Robin

Baby Austina

Baby Abel

Baby Michelle

Baby Lisa

Baby Shannon

Baby Nevin

Baby Connor

Journeys of healing

As pastoral director of the world's largest ministry for healing after abortion, Rachel’s Vineyard, as well as of the largest mobilization of those who speak out about their abortions, the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, I have accompanied countless mothers and fathers on their journeys of healing. And I have presided over the burials of many aborted babies.

One of the key moments of that journey of healing after abortion is when the parents name their child. The moment is powerful and freeing. Up until then, the child was a victim of de-humanization.

Before we can kill, we have to dehumanize. “This is not a child,” we lie to ourselves; or we say, “This is not a child for whom I am responsible right now.”

In these or a thousand other ways, a veil of dehumanization covers the child; a chasm is introduced between that child’s humanity and our awareness of our need to respond to it with an unconditional acknowledgement and acceptance.

But the time is not right, the burden too great, and so we keep any semblance of the child’s humanity as far away from our consciousness as we can.

Power of the name

And that is where the power of the name comes in.

People have names. One of the first things we do when coming into the presence of another person — or even learning about their existence when apart from their presence — is to inquire as to their name.

The name expresses the person, it invites the presence of the person, it both calls and welcomes the person, it acknowledges that there is something in common between the person and ourselves, and hence in receiving their name we offer our own.

In the case of Dr. Gosnell, we have heard of the 45 babies retrieved from the clinic. And we have read the Grand Jury Report and heard the witnesses speak of “Baby Boy A,” “Baby Boy B,” Baby C, D, E, F, and G.

Connecting with the children

But now it’s time, in our collective journey through this nightmare, to connect with these children more directly. It’s time to name the children.

We have no evidence that anyone else has given them a name or was interested in giving them a name. In fact, these babies were brought to an abortion facility to be killed and then thrown away. The fact that their parents abandoned them does not give us permission to do so.

“Though father and mother forsake me, the Lord will receive me,” Scripture tells us (Psalm 27:10). “I have called you by name, you are mine,” the Lord says (Isaiah 43:1).

As Pope John Paul II wrote, “God … has entrusted the life of every individual to his or her fellow human beings, brothers and sisters” (Evangelium Vitae, 76). From the point of view, then, that we are one human family called into being by God, these children are also ours. And that’s why we can name them when nobody else has.

Naming ceremony

This is what Priests for Life has done. On Ascension Thursday, May 9, a simple ceremony was held in the chapel at the headquarters of Priests for Life in Staten Island, N.Y.

We heard the Word of God, prayed for these babies, their families, and those who participated in their deaths. And we then named them. I chose the name “Adam” for “Baby Boy A,” simply as a reminder that Adam, the first man ever created, reminds us that in each man — and in each child — all humanity is somehow represented, and that our response to that one person, whether acceptance or rejection, shapes our response to every person.

I named “Baby Boy B” Michael, to remind us of the struggle between good and evil that rages in our culture and in our own mind and heart as we choose how we will respond to each person.

Most of the other names are gender-neutral, since we do not have information on the genders of most of the babies.

Shared human nature

Moreover, the naming ceremony took place on this Feast of the Ascension, for on that day, the humanity that the Lord Jesus took to the heights of heaven is the same human nature shared by all of us — rich and poor, healthy and sick, born and unborn — and by all these babies.

We remembered all the babies killed by Dr. Gosnell, well beyond those found in his clinic, as well as the over 50 million children killed across America since Roe v. Wade declared they were not persons.

The names we gave to the 45 babies follow. We invite you to pray for them and their families, and for Dr. Gosnell and his staff. We look forward, once receiving permission of the Medical Examiner, to give these children a proper funeral and burial.

From the Grand Jury Report: “The Philadelphia medical examiner analyzed the remains of 45 fetuses seized from the clinic. Of these, 16 were first-trimester; 25 were second-trimester, ranging from 12 to 21 weeks; two were 22 weeks; one was 26 weeks; and one was 28 weeks.”

Fr. Frank Pavone is national director of Priests for Life.