Local/State News National/World News
The Catholic Herald: Official Newspaper of the Diocese of Madison Front page Most recent issue Past issues
Bishop Speaks
April 6, 2006 Edition

 Search this site:

You are here: Bishop Speaks
About Us

How to submit photos/ads to the Catholic Herald
Catholic Herald Youth page
Jump to:
New Since the Print Edition ...
    "The Dictatorship of Relativism" (Full text of keynote address by Bishop
    Morlino at National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in Washington on April 7, 2006)

Under the Gospel Book
• Bishop's Letter: Operation Rice Bowl
Bishops' Schedules
About Bishop Morlino
About Bishop Emeritus Bullock
en Español:

"Bajo el Libro del Evangelio"
• Desayuno Nacional de Oración Católica -- "La Dictadura del Relativismo" Adobe PDF icon
    (PDF en Español, 43.7 KB)

Bishops' Schedules:
Bishop Robert C. Morlino

Thursday, April 6, 2006
6:30 p.m. -- Concelebrate National Catholic Prayer Breakfast Mass, St. Matthew Cathedral, Washington, D.C.

8:00 p.m. -- Attend National Catholic Prayer Breakfast Reception, Army/Navy Club, Washington, D.C.

Friday, April 7, 2006
7:00 a.m. -- Keynote Speaker at National Catholic Prayer Breakfast, Hilton Washington, Washington, D.C.

Sunday, April 9, 2006
11:00 a.m. -- Preside and Preach at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Stational Mass -- Palm Sunday, St. Patrick Church, Madison

2:30 p.m. -- Viewing of The Passion, Bishop O'Connor Pastoral Center, Madison

Tuesday, April 11, 2006
7:30 p.m. -- Concelebrate and Preach at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Diocesan Chrism Mass, St. Maria Goretti Church, Madison

Bishop William H. Bullock

Saturday, April 8, 2006
11:00 a.m. -- Preside and Preach at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Apostolate to the Handicapped, Monroe High School, Monroe

Monday, April 10, 2006
12:00 p.m. -- Preside and Preach at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Bishop O'Connor Catholic Pastoral Center, Madison

Tuesday, April 11, 2006
7:30 p.m. -- Concelebrate with Bishop Morlino at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Diocesan Chrism Mass, St. Maria Goretti Church, Madison

Bishop George O. Wirz

Saturday, April 8, 2006
11:00 a.m. -- Concelebrate the Celebration of the Eucharist, Apostolate to the Handicapped, Monroe High School, Monroe

Tuesday, April 11, 2006
7:30 p.m. -- Concelebrate with Bishop Morlino at the Celebration of the Eucharist, Diocesan Chrism Mass, St. Maria Goretti Church, Madison

New Since the Print Edition:
-- Posted: 4/11/2006, 2:55 p.m. Central Time

National Catholic Prayer Breakfast

April 7, 2006

"The Dictatorship
of Relativism"

Adobe PDF icon For a PDF version
of this keynote address,
click here (26.5 KB file)

Adobe PDF icon en Español (43.7 KB)

Since I was asked to address the topic "The Dictatorship of Relativism" it behooves me to return to the original text from which that very important phrase emanated. In his homily at the mass "Pro Eligendo Romano Pontifice" celebrated in St. Peters Archbasilica on April 18th, 2005, the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, spoke as follows:

"whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be "tossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrine", seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one's own ego and desires. We, however, have a different goal: the Son of God, the true man. He is the measure of true humanism."

In the space of just a few sentences, Pope Benedict connects the dots in terms of relativism as a divorce from God and friendship with Christ, and truth as attained in the most fully human way, only within the context of this friendship. Thus, Pope Benedict takes us back to the insights of the encyclical, Fides et Ratio of John Paul the Great - the desire written by the Creator in every human heart for the truth and for the fullness of love, can only be satisfied in Christ.

Those among you who know me will not find it surprising that my remarks this morning express three points. First I would like to, unpack, if you will, the metaphor of the then Cardinal Ratzinger, articulated as "The Dictatorship of Relativism". I would note that just this past January, Pope Benedict spoke of policies which promote contraception and abortion as "a dogma of hedonism" which opens the door to the culture of death. The second comment regarding a dogma of hedonism leading to a culture of death certainly explicates the metaphor "Dictatorship of Relativism" as we shall see.

The first question we might ask as we unpack the metaphor "the Dictatorship of Relativism" is "Who are the members of the junta who govern this dictatorship?" As one who is called to Holy Orders, and thus to refrain even from the appearance of offering partisan political comments, it would be best for me to refrain from naming the key players. However, we all know that the mass media are generally accomplices to those who govern the Dictatorship of Relativism; they are generally not innocent bystanders or detached journalists who report in an objective way - willing cooperators in this dictatorship are also those who live their lives according to polling results, frequently sponsored by the mass media.

We might also ask "What are the principal enforcement mechanisms of the Dictatorship of Relativism, what weapons are contained in the arsenal of these dictators?" The first is inconsistency in civil law and practice, inconsistency being just another instance of relativism. This inconsistency is especially neuralgic because the civil law is our teacher. We have the very same individuals protesting against warrantless surveillance of possible terrorists' activities, and then in the northwest, affirming warrantless surveillance of people's garbage containers to ensure that no recyclables are to be found. On the one hand warrantless surveillance with regard to possible terrorism is politically incorrect while warrantless surveillance of personal garbage is politically correct. The polls determine what is politically correct and thus the same people find themselves caught in a clear inconsistency in the context of a culture which never even thinks to question it. Polls rarely divulge information which reaches beyond the trivial and transitory but truth is neither trivial nor transitory. Those who claim otherwise promote the Dictatorship of Relativism.

A second example of this inconsistency has to do with killing of a mother who is carrying a child. In certain instances the murderer is charged with the death of two human beings, both mother and child. However, if a woman exercises her alleged reproductive rights and has an abortion, the law clearly determines that no crime of murder has been committed. Thus, a human life is precious when someone thinks it is, be it a parent or be it a civil court, and when that life is deemed not to be human or otherwise be without value, then it is expendable. This kind of gross inconsistency is not questioned in our society but is taken for granted with serenity, sad to say.

In addition to inconsistency in the civil law and practice, the second weapon in the arsenal of those who would dictate relativism to the rest of us consists in a series of linguistic redefinitions, euphemisms, and other anomalies. Language, as the philosopher Heidegger said, "is the house of being". If our language is contorted and deconstructed through euphemisms, redefinitions and other anomalies then, the being housed by language becomes indeterminate, there are no fixed meanings, that is relativism pushed to its pinnacle, nihilism itself. Allow me to take a brief excursion into these redefinitions, euphemisms, and anomalies.

In the first case, our society speaks of openness and tolerance as almost supreme virtues but to be open means precisely to be closed to the objective truth. If one would claim the existence of objective truth, one is considered closed and arrogant, rather than open and tolerant. So go the language games. The euphemistic approach is perhaps best captured by the words "late-term abortion." This term covers up the fact that a partially born human being is brutally murdered in the process of being born. It is always interesting to hear the commentators talk about late-term abortions, adding that these are sometimes called partial-birth abortions by anti-abortion activists. If one were to watch a video of this procedure taking place would one more likely describe it as a late-term abortion or a partial-birth abortion?

We also have the euphemism - discard, used when speaking of the fate of frozen embryos which are "superfluous" and "left-over" as part of the process of in-vitro fertilization. We never speak of the destruction of innocent human beings whose fate has become absurd and who are completely under the domination of other human beings. We say that these human beings are discarded, like the one last sticky note on our notepad that might just as soon be discarded, as we take out a fresh pad for our use. There are many language games being played. Supreme Court justices we're told, should be uniters not dividers, when it comes to Roe v. Wade. How ironic, since Roe v. Wade has become our great source of division. Now to be a uniter means to uphold that which divided us in the first place.

Pro-choice. I've never heard anyone defend a pro-choice position with regard to bank robbery. The only time this expression is used without reference to what we're pro-choice about is when the most innocent and helpless human being is at stake. Pro-choice is synonymous with pro-abortion because no one speaks of pro-choice in any other context. Pro-choice is a euphemism that causes us to forget the baby.

The word "transparency" it seems to me, is being used so that we no longer even hear the word "truth" in our public dialogue and conversation. We already have a very good word for transparency: truth and truthfulness. Why is it the agenda of some to rid our language of the usage of the word, truth? Talk about the Dictatorship of Relativism! When the term "pro-choice" won the day in our cultural, linguistic usage we temporarily lost the battle to protect the most innocent and most helpless human lives. Language games, euphemisms, redefinitions are very dangerous. We are at the point where, because of in-vitro fertilization, surrogate motherhood and what flows from that, we are no longer sure what the words "father" and "mother" mean. In some cases, there is the genetic mother, the gestational mother, and the mother who actually raises the child to adulthood. There are at least three mothers. When we move to the redefinition of marriage, as including other options than "one husband - one wife - one lifetime - with openness to children", we find ourselves in very troubling waters indeed. The Dictatorship of Relativism gains strength from the outrageous manipulation of language, and if we are to overcome this dictatorship with true democracy, we're going to have to regain control of the use of language so as to point to the objective truth. Certain Catholic legislators recently received a correction from our Bishops' Conference when they attempted to promote a redefinition of primacy of conscience as a line item veto with regard to elements of the Ten Commandments and the teachings of the Church, another example of surrender to the Dictatorship of Relativism.

Let me move on to the second point which, thank God, can be made more briefly. The opposite of dictatorship is democracy. The Dictatorship of Relativism leads to secularism as a state imposed religion. Only in the context of relativism and deconstructionalism can secularism flourish. Religions, generally, make claims to objective truth. To impose secularism as the state religion one must rule out as outrageous the concept of objective truth, which is precisely what the Dictatorship of Relativism seeks to accomplish. Opposition to the Dictatorship of Relativism involves the right relationship of church and state as taught by the Second Vatican Council and repeated by Pope Benedict XVI in his recent encyclical Deus Caritas Est - God is Love. The relationship between church and state involves three simple rules. First, the state is never to force anyone to practice a particular religion. Secondly, the state is never to prevent anyone from practicing a particular religion. And third, generally the state should favor the practice of religion, because religious experience includes a moral code according to which people restrain themselves so that restraint by the state becomes less necessary. Thus if the state wishes to encourage democracy and needs less to intervene in the lives of individuals, one key to this strengthening of the sphere of freedom, this strengthening of democracy, is the favoring of religion by the state. Secularism founded upon relativism and deconstructionalism, should never be imposed as a state religion.

The third and last point is, "what should our response be as we seek to protect democracy and combat the Dictatorship of Relativism?" Our response is not to seek the embodiment of distinctive Catholic convictions in civil law. We should not be seeking to pass civil laws requiring belief in the Trinity or attendance at Sunday Mass or fasting from meat during the Fridays of Lent. Our response should be to seek the embodiment of natural law in the civil law. Natural law is that law written on the human heart which can be known by every human being through reason alone. There are three propositions of the natural law that need our attention and promotion precisely as such, that is to say, as natural law not as distinctively Christian or Catholic doctrine. The first is the existence of God. The founding documents of our country made reference to nature and to nature's God because there are a variety of ways through which reason arrives at the conclusion that the Creator God exists. There are arguments that are more experientially based, there are arguments that are more abstract, but there are valid arguments which prove the existence of God. They are arguments of philosophy or logic; they are not arguments of science. Nothing is more narrow than to claim that the only real truth is scientific truth. This claim serves the cause of relativism because scientific truth develops through paradigm change whereas objective truth does not. Objective truth is not subject to paradigm change; its substance never needs to be updated. It is good when science advances through paradigm change. But to grant the claim that scientific truth is the highest form of truth is to hand over the day to those who lead the Dictatorship of Relativism.

The second proposition of the natural law teaches us that every human being has a priceless and unique dignity. So many modern and contemporary philosophers have arrived quite apart from religious faith at the conviction that a person is an end in him or herself and never a means to an end. Persons are never to be manipulated or treated as things by other persons. To live in peace in a just society is impossible apart from the conviction arrived at by reason alone, that every person is an end in himself or herself and never to be used as a means. The third proposition of the natural law teaches us, as we reflect on the desire of every human being for social relationships and intimacy, and on human anatomy - that marriage means a one-flesh communion of "one husband - one wife - for one lifetime - with openness to children". Artificial contraception and abortion are not behaviors which someone has a right to choose. To be sure, one is able to choose them but there is no right to do so. One has a right to marry or not to marry. Within marriage, one has a right to acts of marital intimacy and by mutual agreement, husband and wife also have a right to refrain from those acts for a just cause. Husband and wife do not have a right to a child - a child is a human being, a human being is not a thing, people have rights to things, and they never have rights to human beings. So there is no right to a child, there is no right to abortion, there is no right to artificial contraception. There is a right to marry or not. There is a right to the acts proper to marriage. That is a scandalously brief overview of the natural law.

In closing, let me say that we must reclaim the proper use of language if we are to combat the dictatorship of relativism. Instead of hearing "pro-choice" all over the place, we need to promote the use of "natural law" all over the place or better some equivalent, that is a more catchy sound-bite. Some of you might well be gifted to articulate that sound-bite. We need to insist that the existence of God, the dignity of every human being, and the definition of marriage are not catholic curiosities that we are trying to force on the rest of the world, but the dictates of reason - of the natural law itself. Language has been used to lead us into the Dictatorship of Relativism, the dogma of hedonism, and the culture of death. But Jesus Christ is Risen from the dead and the Church is alive with the truth of Christ and the truth of the natural law. Let us live with joy and with hope, proclaiming the truth of Christ with love for all, but especially for our time and our culture, proclaiming with love and a smile the truth of the natural law.

When you and I were first created, that is, when the Lord created your soul and mine, we glimpsed, just for a moment, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. And as soon as our souls took flesh, when we were conceived in our mother's womb, because we were not immaculately conceived like our Blessed Mother but conceived as heirs of the sin of Adam, we experienced a kind of amnesia and forgetfulness of that glimpse which we have had of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. When we listen to the voice of reason within us, that word, that meaning, is an echo of the Eternal Word Whom we saw and heard at the moment of the creation of our soul. The law of reason within us when given unrestricted range cannot arrive at any other truth in the end than the truth of Jesus Christ. He is Risen, His victory is ours. The challenges are difficult but we have every reason, the reason who is Christ Himself, never to give in to discouragement. Our faith in which alone our reason finds total fulfillment, that faith is our sure victory. Thank you for listening to me. God bless you all! Praised be Jesus Christ!

Jump to:   Top of page

Holy Week: Invitation
to attend important liturgies

illustration of Gospel Book being held open over bishop's head

Under the
Gospel Book

+ Bishop Robert
C. Morlino

Dear Friends,

This past Sunday we celebrated the first anniversary of the death of John Paul the Great, now declared "Servant of God" and on the road to sainthood. I hope that all of us have taken time in recent days to reflect on the great gift of God that is John Paul the Great, and to pray for his speedy canonization. We can afford to be no less grateful for the gift of Pope Benedict who unquestionably brings his own unique set of gifts to the office wherein he wears the shoes of Peter.

Related article:

It is hard to believe that Easter Sunday is less than two weeks away. It always seems that way! I hope that all of our Lenten efforts will intensify during these final days of Lent leading into the celebration of the Sacred Triduum. Most importantly I hope that you have made or will make it your top spiritual priority to be present for the special liturgies of Holy Week, at the Chrism Mass on Tuesday evening at 7:30 p.m. which will take place at St. Maria Goretti Church in Madison and is truly a diocesan celebration - and as well at the celebrations of Palm Sunday Mass, the Evening Mass of the Lord's Supper on Holy Thursday, the Solemn Commemoration of the Passion of the Lord on Friday afternoon, and the great Easter Vigil on Holy Saturday.

These celebrations are the most important of the whole Church year and, for those of us who take seriously our Catholic faith, are really of the highest priority. The Solemn Easter Vigil on Holy Saturday night is the single most important liturgical celebration in the entire Church year. In some situations, this mass is not well attended because it is considered to last too long and to go too late into the night. Each pastor with his parish family must determine how best to provide for a worthy celebration of this most important liturgy as well as to provide in such wise as to encourage attendance.

For my own part, the Solemn Easter Vigil at St. Patrick Church, Madison will begin at 8:00 p.m., and it will be celebrated with the customary reverence but also so as to conclude at roughly 10:30 p.m. or before. In this way I hope that this most important liturgy of the Church year will be reasonably available to people within our own cultural setting.

So please do feel welcome at all of these important liturgies in your own home parish, or at the Bishop's celebration at St. Patrick Church in Madison. Our communion in Christ through the journey of the liturgies of Holy Week sets the tone for the practice of our faith every Sunday and every day during the rest of the Church year. Even if we have 'slipped' somewhat in our Lenten observance, the Lord will allow us to regain a lot of ground through fervent participation in the Holy Week liturgies, including a good confession made at Easter time. There is still time for us to plan for a holy and joyful celebration of the death and resurrection of Jesus. Let us do so whole-heartedly!

Thank you for reading this and God bless each one of you.

Praised be Jesus Christ!

Jump to:   Top of page

Bishop's Letter

Operation Rice Bowl

Dear Brothers and Sisters, All in the Lord,

During Lent, as we are called to fast, pray, and share our bounty with others, Operation Rice Bowl (ORB) creates a way to make this meaningful.

Related articles:

As news coverage fades for the disasters and famines in the world, we must remember that our brothers and sisters still need our steadfast assistance. There are others who have not made the headlines, but are still in great need. Jesus said, "Feed my sheep." He did not specify where the flocks were located.

Generous giving to Operation Rice Bowl helps people in our Diocese and in 98 countries.

Hunger is somewhat hidden in our Diocese, especially in the rural areas. Your donation helps fund an innovative way to provide healthy food to those in need here in Wisconsin. Of every dollar you contribute, 25 cents stays within the Diocese to fight hunger. Catholic Charities and the Office of Justice and Pastoral Outreach plan to use these funds to stock a "food pantry on wheels" to deliver food to parishes and food pantries.

Now, as we see the joy of Easter approaching, I ask you to help feed those who are hungry. As you fast, remember those who fast, but not by choice. Pray for an end to hunger. Think of the blessings you have as you give to Operation Rice Bowl to help feed the people of our Diocese and the world.

Praised be Jesus Christ!

Most Reverend Robert C. Morlino
Bishop of Madison

Jump to:   Top of page

Front page           Most recent issue           Past issues

Diocese of Madison, The Catholic Herald
Offices: Bishop O'Connor Catholic Pastoral Center, 702 S. High Point Road, Madison
Mailing address: P.O. Box 44985, Madison, WI 53744-4985
Phone: 608-821-3070     Fax: 608-821-3071     E-Mail: info@madisoncatholicherald.org